Typografische Hierarchie
Die visuelle Gliederung von Text durch Größe, Stärke, Farbe und Abstand, um den Leser nach Wichtigkeit durch den Inhalt zu führen.
Typographic hierarchy is the systematic use of visual variation — size, weight, color, spacing, and typeface — to signal the relative importance of text elements and guide readers through content in a deliberate sequence. Good hierarchy answers the question "what should I read first?" at a glance.
Hierarchy is not decoration. It is information architecture expressed through type.
The core tools of hierarchy:
Size is the most powerful signal. A 2× size difference between heading and body creates unmistakable priority. Size alone can establish a basic hierarchy, but relying on it exclusively produces flat, monotonous results.
Weight adds fine-grained distinction. In a system where heading sizes are fixed by grid constraints, weight variation — regular, medium, semibold, bold — allows sub-levels of importance:
/* Primary heading: size + weight */
h1 { font-size: 3rem; font-weight: 800; color: #111; }
/* Secondary: smaller, lighter */
h2 { font-size: 2rem; font-weight: 600; color: #222; }
/* Tertiary: same weight as h2, but smaller + different color */
h3 { font-size: 1.375rem; font-weight: 600; color: #444; }
/* Body: visually subordinate */
p { font-size: 1rem; font-weight: 400; color: #333; }
/* Caption / metadata: receded */
.caption { font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: 400; color: #777; }
Color signals importance without changing size. Dark text reads as primary; lighter gray text recedes. Avoid using hue alone for hierarchy (accessibility concern), but luminance contrast is a reliable tool.
Typeface — using a display font for headings and a text font for body — establishes hierarchy through a distinct change in character. This works best when the contrast is clear: a slab serif heading with a humanist sans-serif body, for example.
Spacing creates groupings. Headers that sit closer to the content below them than to the content above form a visual unit, communicating that the heading belongs to what follows:
h2 {
margin-top: 2.5em; /* large gap above — separates from previous section */
margin-bottom: 0.5em; /* small gap below — stays close to its content */
}
Common mistakes:
Using too many levels of hierarchy without sufficient differentiation between them produces visual noise rather than structure. Aim for 3-5 distinct levels that are clearly distinguishable from each other. If you can't tell h3 from h4 without reading the HTML, the hierarchy isn't working.
Over-relying on size without varying weight makes text feel either too large or too dense. The most readable hierarchies use 2-3 size levels combined with 2-3 weight levels.
Inter is particularly effective for UI hierarchy because its extensive weight range (100-900) provides fine-grained control without switching typefaces.
Related Terms
Fonts That Illustrate This Concept
Learn More
Font choice communicates brand personality before anyone reads a word. A strategic framework for choosing typography that matches your brand identity.
Font ReviewsPoppins brings geometric precision with a friendly personality. A complete guide to one of Google Fonts' most popular display-ready sans-serifs.
Font ReviewsTwo condensed display fonts that dominate headlines. Oswald vs Bebas Neue — which bold, narrow typeface should you reach for?
Font ReviewsPresentations demand fonts that are readable at a distance, work at large sizes, and look polished. The best Google Fonts for slides.