タイポグラフィ階層
サイズ・ウェイト・色・スペーシングを使ってテキストを視覚的に整理し、読者を重要度の順にコンテンツへ誘導する構造。
Typographic hierarchy is the systematic use of visual variation — size, weight, color, spacing, and typeface — to signal the relative importance of text elements and guide readers through content in a deliberate sequence. Good hierarchy answers the question "what should I read first?" at a glance.
Hierarchy is not decoration. It is information architecture expressed through type.
The core tools of hierarchy:
Size is the most powerful signal. A 2× size difference between heading and body creates unmistakable priority. Size alone can establish a basic hierarchy, but relying on it exclusively produces flat, monotonous results.
Weight adds fine-grained distinction. In a system where heading sizes are fixed by grid constraints, weight variation — regular, medium, semibold, bold — allows sub-levels of importance:
/* Primary heading: size + weight */
h1 { font-size: 3rem; font-weight: 800; color: #111; }
/* Secondary: smaller, lighter */
h2 { font-size: 2rem; font-weight: 600; color: #222; }
/* Tertiary: same weight as h2, but smaller + different color */
h3 { font-size: 1.375rem; font-weight: 600; color: #444; }
/* Body: visually subordinate */
p { font-size: 1rem; font-weight: 400; color: #333; }
/* Caption / metadata: receded */
.caption { font-size: 0.875rem; font-weight: 400; color: #777; }
Color signals importance without changing size. Dark text reads as primary; lighter gray text recedes. Avoid using hue alone for hierarchy (accessibility concern), but luminance contrast is a reliable tool.
Typeface — using a display font for headings and a text font for body — establishes hierarchy through a distinct change in character. This works best when the contrast is clear: a slab serif heading with a humanist sans-serif body, for example.
Spacing creates groupings. Headers that sit closer to the content below them than to the content above form a visual unit, communicating that the heading belongs to what follows:
h2 {
margin-top: 2.5em; /* large gap above — separates from previous section */
margin-bottom: 0.5em; /* small gap below — stays close to its content */
}
Common mistakes:
Using too many levels of hierarchy without sufficient differentiation between them produces visual noise rather than structure. Aim for 3-5 distinct levels that are clearly distinguishable from each other. If you can't tell h3 from h4 without reading the HTML, the hierarchy isn't working.
Over-relying on size without varying weight makes text feel either too large or too dense. The most readable hierarchies use 2-3 size levels combined with 2-3 weight levels.
Inter is particularly effective for UI hierarchy because its extensive weight range (100-900) provides fine-grained control without switching typefaces.
Related Terms
Fonts That Illustrate This Concept
Learn More
Font choice communicates brand personality before anyone reads a word. A strategic framework for choosing typography that matches your brand identity.
Font ReviewsPoppins brings geometric precision with a friendly personality. A complete guide to one of Google Fonts' most popular display-ready sans-serifs.
Font ReviewsTwo condensed display fonts that dominate headlines. Oswald vs Bebas Neue — which bold, narrow typeface should you reach for?
Font ReviewsPresentations demand fonts that are readable at a distance, work at large sizes, and look polished. The best Google Fonts for slides.