Barlow Condensed vs Roboto Condensed
Side-by-side comparison of two Google Fonts families.
Barlow Condensed
Sans Serif
Roboto Condensed
Sans Serif
Character Comparison
AaBbCcDdEeFfGg
HhIiJjKkLlMmNn
OoPpQqRrSsTtUu
VvWwXxYyZz
0123456789
HhIiJjKkLlMmNn
OoPpQqRrSsTtUu
VvWwXxYyZz
0123456789
AaBbCcDdEeFfGg
HhIiJjKkLlMmNn
OoPpQqRrSsTtUu
VvWwXxYyZz
0123456789
HhIiJjKkLlMmNn
OoPpQqRrSsTtUu
VvWwXxYyZz
0123456789
Comparison Table
| Property | Barlow Condensed | Roboto Condensed |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sans Serif | Sans Serif |
| Style | — | neo-grotesque |
| Weights | 9 | 9 |
| Available weights |
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
|
| Italic | Yes | Yes |
| Variants | 18 | 18 |
| Subsets |
latin
latin-ext
vietnamese
|
cyrillic
cyrillic-ext
greek
greek-ext
latin
latin-ext
vietnamese
|
| Korean | No | No |
| Popularity | #64 | #10 |
| Designer | Jeremy Tribby | Christian Robertson |
| License | OFL | OFL |
| Google Fonts | Open | Open |
Weight Comparison
Barlow Condensed
Thin (100)
ExtraLight (200)
Light (300)
Regular (400)
Medium (500)
SemiBold (600)
Bold (700)
ExtraBold (800)
Black (900)
Roboto Condensed
Thin (100)
ExtraLight (200)
Light (300)
Regular (400)
Medium (500)
SemiBold (600)
Bold (700)
ExtraBold (800)
Black (900)
Try Other Comparisons
Explore more side-by-side font comparisons.